I’ve never seen this, but as one trusty Prologuer pointed out, the defense bill was just passed. I’m quick to rebut that what follows is not just defense procurement but a bevvy (and incomplete) summary of what has been contracted government-wide over the last week. There’s over one hundred and thirteen separate contracts listed by the Washington Post on the flip side – try to find your favorite! I’ve still never seen this many in the Post before…
Posts Tagged ‘DoD’
A busy week for the kids in accounting
Posted in Procurement Corner, tagged DoD, Procurment Corner on October 6, 2008| Leave a Comment »
Coasting Guards
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Bertholf, Coast Guard, Deepwater, DoD, GAO, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman on March 13, 2008| Leave a Comment »
The US Coast Guard has been the focal point of many scrutinous eyes as of late. The highly anticipated and highly funded program, Integrated Deepwater System Program (Deepwater) is a 25-year, $24 billion program to integrate and modernize the fleet of aircraft, ships, logistics and command systems of the US Coast Guard. This program was started in 2002 and it has been a contentious program since the beginning.
Nunn-McCurdy, ’nuff Said
Posted in DoD, GAO, tagged DoD, Government Accounting Office, Nunn-McCurdy on January 29, 2008| Leave a Comment »
After perusing some of my favorite Military rags the other day, I came across a lesser known, but gem of a magazine called National Defense. It was time for the February edition. This publication is well read at the Pentagon and no doubt by those contractors who work with the DoD. It usually has a flare of “look at my knew gun” or “I woke up and there were seven new digits in my bank account” type stories, however, Sandra I. Erwin wrote a piece about Pentagon procurement officers working to keep their programs on budget. She was borderline cavalier with some of points of egregious overspending, but she brought up a wonderfully overlooked law called the Nunn-McCurdy Amendment.
RFID Madness: The Chatter Is Growing
Posted in RFID, tagged CBP, Center for Democracy and Technology, Department of Agriculture, DHS, DoD on January 8, 2008| 3 Comments »
The hits keep on comin’. Yesterday, both the Federal Times and Government Executive, a pair of publications made for civil service and national security information technocrats, respectively published stories relating to the RFID embedded passport cards and the basic shortcomings of the technology’s use in government. While the Federal Times story hits on much the same points already reported on, Government Executive takes an extensive look at the hype and disappointment surrounding RFID across various government agencies.
“… Our facilities are stretched to the limit.”
Posted in borders, RFID, tagged DHS, DoD, FBI, Fusion Centers, RFID, SBInet, State Department on January 7, 2008| 3 Comments »
As was reported last week, the State Department intends to issue new passport cards embedded with Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips. This is but the latest in a long string of technologies being implemented at our nation’s borders and seaports. Fusion Centers, virtual fences (through a program called SBInet) and 10-point-finger scans (through a program called Registered Traveler / US-VISIT) are among the major projects being promoted by the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Defense Department in an effort to secure borders, airports and seaports from illegal immigrants and terrorists. (more…)
Next Generation Identification
Posted in FBI, Uncategorized, tagged Biometrics, DoD, identification technology on December 26, 2007| 2 Comments »
Biometrics is the buzz in identification technology these days. Saturday, the Washington Post reported on a $1 billion project, called Next Generation Identification, being shopped around by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to build the worlds “largest computer database of peoples’ physical characteristics.” The FBI already houses one of the largest databases of biometric, but this 10-year contract will look to expand the database and make it searchable to the over 900,000 federal, state and local law enforcement agents who have access to it now. Fingerprints, DNA, iris patters, palm prints and face shape are among the most common measures of biometrics – but soon, voice signature, walking patters and other less definable characteristics will be able to give away your identity to law enforcement, for good or ill.